We weren't able to visit our own library (no secret there!) so I chose a large library within a local community that I have heard a lot about - but this was my first visit. I came in armed to ask for some help in getting a recommendation for the Romantic Suspense annotation this week. I somewhat familiarized myself with both the library layout, and the collection, but wandering around; additionally, I had located some Romantic Suspense authors prior to my trip, so I also checked to see if the library carried those authors.
This library is large/lucky enough to have a separate Readers' Advisory desk that is manned by reference staff. It is bright, well marked, and flanked by various displays from the library staff. I approached the desk and asked its librarian (we'll call him Joe) for help finding a book to read. A rough exchange, something like the below, happened:
Joe: Hello (upon my approach)
Me: Hi, Joe...(awkward pause) I'm looking for a book. Can you help?
Joe: Yes I can. What are you looking for?
Me: Well, I don't really know. I like romance but I'm getting tired of the predictable plots. So I want something with some more edge. But nothing without a love story.
Joe: What have you read recently? What did you like?
Me: I answered that I had been reading some things by Robyn Carr and Nora Roberts but I was getting tired of the story line being so predictable. But I did like the female characters who had a little attitude.
Joe: What makes you not like a book?
Me: I answered that I didn’t like horror and I don’t like anything too predictable or cutesy. I also noted that I don't prefer non-fiction.
After this exchange, Joe utilized NoveList to run a search for authors I may enjoy. He did not communicate with me while doing it, so I asked what he was doing/what he was using. I asked, as I remembered from Reference, that librarians are supposed to talk through what they are doing (when possible) so that the patron feels involved in the exchange.
Joe decided on three authors I should pursue for Romantic Suspense: Karen Robards, Heather Graham and Laurell K. Hamilton. He also suggested that I may want to try Jane Green and Emily Giffin if I didn't want a suspenseful story. After handing me the list, Joe pointed to the general direction of the fiction collection and told me I should check it out.
So - what did I think? Well, I'm torn. On one hand, I got what I came for - he provided readers' advisory service, used appropriate tools and conducted a brief interview and was somewhat helpful. I could tell that he had provided this service and was skilled in his knowledge. On the other hand, I was left with the impression that he was totally disengaged, and I believe he should have done more to engage me and "create a climate that encourages readers to talk about books and authors" (Ross et al., 2002). Additionally, I would have felt like I had better service if he suggested specific books and/or had walked me over to where I might find some of the authors he suggested.
This opportunity certainly provides me with a better perspective of a successful readers' advisory interview. I know that the level of service I provide to patrons will certainly increase as a result of this experience!
Reference
Ross, C. S.,
Nilsen, K., & Dewdney, P. (2002). The readers’ advisory interview. In Conducting the Reference Interview (pp.
163-175). New York: Neal-Schuman.
My experience also involved a lot of silence. Which is very disappointing in a readers' advisory capacity and a complete no-no for a reference interview.
ReplyDeleteIn my time at the reference desk, I've learned a little humility goes a long way. If a librarian is having trouble finding what someone is looking for, a little chit-chat, or some humor will place the patron in a more forgiving attitude.
As a learning experience, I am sure you will be glad this happened, because now you've seen how a patron can perceive a bad experience.
I agree! Sometimes I feel like I'm babbling but I think that patrons usually appreciate that I'm trying to keep them engaged with what I'm doing.
DeleteI agree with both of you 100%. I usually default to humor and mindless chatter...and if I'm having trouble finding something, I have occasionally blamed it on "a slow computer." I should take the humility route more often! I'm always amazed at how patient patrons can be here as opposed to other places (banks, supermarkets, etc) where they have to wait while the service professional figures out how to help them!
ReplyDelete